Skip to content

HR FAQs

Need a helping hand with your HR queries?

We’ve got you covered with our HR frequently asked questions (FAQs) for business owners! Have a question not answered here? Just get in touch with us here.

Both “without prejudice” and “protected conversations” regulate the admissibility of documents and discussions, usually before a settlement agreement, in future legal proceedings. But there are differences in the application and use of “without prejudice” and “protected conversations” and the case law is separate. It can be expensive for the employer if it gets it wrong.

“Without prejudice” is a common law principle – it is derived from case law. It prevents
statements, whether written or oral, from being put before an employment tribunal or court as evidence in legal proceedings. It can apply to any type of claim – for example, unfair dismissal, unlawful discrimination, unlawful deduction of wages and breach of contract. But there are the following conditions:

– It must relate to an existing dispute – this usually means that the employee is considering bringing a claim.
– Both parties must make a genuine attempt to resolve that dispute. There must be no
“unambiguous impropriety” in the conduct of the parties during the settlement discussions, such impropriety might include blackmail, fraud, threats, physical intimidation or assault.

“Protected conversations” are a statutory scheme under s.111A of the Employment Rights Act. They permit discussions between an employer and employee with a view to terminate employment on agreed terms to remain confidential and inadmissible in proceedings for unfair dismissal before an employment tribunal. There are certain differences from the “without prejudice” rule.

  • The protection only applies to unfair dismissal. It does not apply to any other claims such as discrimination or whistleblowing. There is no need for an existing dispute – the offer to the employee can come, therefore, “out of the blue”.
  • Protection will be lost where there is improper behaviour – such as pressure for the
    employee to resign, harassment or bullying.
  • The principle does not apply in Northern Ireland.

T Levels are equivalent to three A Levels and are carried out over a two-year programme of study. Skills areas range from digital and healthcare to construction, business and education and more.

An industry placement is at the heart of each T Level; placements last a minimum of 315 hours (approximately 45 days in day release or blocks) with an average of 350 hours (750 hours is the minimum for the early years educator specialism and 600 hours for dental nursing).

Placements don’t have to take place over two years; they can start later in year one or take place entirely in year two.

If the employer can’t offer the full hours, the placement could be shared with another employer (although a placement cannot be shared between more than two employers).

Only one legal change has come into play immediately on Royal Assent and this only affects key public sector services such as health services, education, fire and rescue, border security and transport. The rules on minimum service levels during a strike no longer apply from the date the Bill received Royal Assent. In reality, this will have little impact because the rules were never fully utilised.

Within two months of Royal Assent, the administration rules around industrial action will change. Then, from April 2026, all employees, regardless of their earnings level, will be entitled to receive Statutory Sick Pay (SSP), paid from their first day of absence rather than the fourth day. Employees will also be entitled to paternity leave and parental leave from day one of employment. A new Fair Work Agency will be formed to enforce laws on minimum wage, SSP, etc and the maximum compensation for failure to consult employees during a large redundancy exercise will double to 180 days’ pay.

Employee mental health can be improved through strategic organisation wide approaches that include training managers on identifying mental health issues and ways to support employees who are struggling with them. This can be done by implementing Employee Assistance Programmes, conducting mental health awareness initiatives, making reasonable workplace adjustments and promoting positive mental wellbeing through supportive policies and practices.

The most effective approach to helping with employee mental health is to combine prevention strategies with support for those experiencing mental health difficulties. A comprehensive approach should involve employers identifying stress sources and implementing solutions rather than relying solely on individual-level interventions. Remember, those sources can be external to the workplace as well as coming from within it and can include workload but also interactions with colleagues, especially where they
involve bullying, harassment or discrimination.

Signposting to relevant resources is an important part of this and one that managers can be responsible for. By talking to employees who they think might be struggling, managers can, if appropriate to do so, direct employees towards, e.g. an EAP or a mental health charity to support employees who are struggling with their mental health and ensure they get help from trained professionals.

Rachel Collar, person with blonde hair at at a desk with a book and pen

person-at-desk

Sign up to our HR News Room

Designed for SME business owners and people managers. Don’t miss out on our….
HR tips | Latest HR articles | Practical HR tools | Upcoming events | Freebies & offers

Read our Privacy Policy here